tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-613906834514381088.post8750731532829905973..comments2023-08-17T13:06:03.219+01:00Comments on Science Blog : Biased Reviews of Products OnlineProf Richard Barrett-Jolleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12095618885639365609noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-613906834514381088.post-2723051990970978682016-12-06T17:09:24.473+00:002016-12-06T17:09:24.473+00:00But they publish positive? I would fully accept a ...But they publish positive? I would fully accept a "no health anecdotes" policy, but it has to go both ways or it is really dangerous!<br />No, not contacting the manufacturers. I expect like many of these things it could be a coincidence of course, but I strongly think that if anecdotes are being published they should publish them. The terms and conditions for reviews would only reject this if it was consider defamatory!<br />How many others didn't get on well with it I wonder. Thought I was unique until they rejected that review!Prof Richard Barrett-Jolleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12095618885639365609noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-613906834514381088.post-63801615784292998692016-12-05T07:44:55.249+00:002016-12-05T07:44:55.249+00:00Did you try to contact the manufacturers, Lintbell...Did you try to contact the manufacturers, Lintbells? I think they are a "reputable" company, certainly willing to do evidence-based research, so may be keen to hear your experiences. I'm disappointed in Fetch, as I've always found them a good pet food supplier. However, as a supplier, maybe they won't publish negative "health" reviews from a single customer?Carol's Informed Consent PhDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15847628633631198011noreply@blogger.com