Just before
Christmas @CVSControl portentiously tweeted a link showing that there is a
spike in cardiovascular deaths over the Christmas period. One hypothesis was
that people are dying of elevated emotional stress and that Christmas is an
awfully stressful time for many. #Families. Come Christmas itself there was then
a cluster of high profile deaths; Carrie Fisher and George Michael sadly died
and initial reports (by the popular media) suggested that heart disease was involved.
Then finally, in apparent response to the stress of the untimely death of her
daughter, Debbie Reynolds too died of a cardiovascular event (stroke). Now here are my questions: Firstly, is it even true that people
die of sudden stress or what might be called “emotional shock”? Secondly,
if
that is the case would there even be anything scientists could do about
it anyway!!? OK, spoiler alert: (1)
Answer: Yes. (2) Answer: Probably, in the future.
Longer
version.
1. Does acute emotional shock/stress kill?
Now the
Cardiovascular control Twitter Feed @CVSControl includes in its Bio: “Our live[s are] in the hands of the next
rascal who chooses to annoy [us]”.
Sure enough, this phrase was written by Dr John Hunter (1728-1793) who
subsequently, it is said, dropped dead of a heart attack during a particularly
acrimonious University Staff meeting.
…but, in fact, you will find the true dangers of getting cross or over-excited
are not terribly well established. That said, we do know a fair amount about how the
stress response (emotional shock) increases heart rate and blood pressure: What
happens is that the brains of most animals from mice to people or dogs are
wired to detect threats and send a burst of nerve (so called “sympathetic
nerve”) and hormone activity to all those parts of the body involved with fighting
or flight (aka escaping). That’s great
if you do need to fight or flight, but is it dangerous when this happens at
other times? You see the vast majority
of people that die of heart disease actually have high blood pressure and atherosclerosis
etc. Essentially they have their coronary arteries all furred up. In research
terms, I don’t have the figures, but I am confident that the vast majority of
cardiovascular research funding goes towards investigation of heart and blood
vessels themselves, not their control. This perpetuates a myth that cardiovascular
disease is all about those very hearts and blood vessels. So back to the
question; does a sudden shock lead to cardiovascular deaths?
Well there are lots of bits and pieces of
data that suggest this is the case. For example there are spikes of heart
related deaths during big football matches:
During the 17th January 1993 San Fernando Earthquake, many more people died of sudden cardiovascular death than would usually be expected for a normal January day. In fact the sudden cardiac deaths on 17th January 1993 were about 3x or more higher than the previous 3 years:
And yes Anger too; see (below) how many more people die shortly after bursts of rage:
And even just the shock of getting up in the morning is deadly:
I think the moral of this graph is you should definitely NOT wake me up before you go go. |
...and now it would seem, Christmas is also a cause of sudden cardiac death!
Since, however, most of these sudden cardiac death victims have
other types of cardiovascular disease too, believe it or not; this hypothesis
is still not widely accepted. It will probably be impossible to ever prove it
for sure, but I believe that the balance of evidence confirms that emotional
stress can kill.
2. Could the acute stress/shock cardiovascular response
be prevented?
Well,
naturally that is something I, and a few other people are keen to explore. Essentially, we think that if we can identify
the exact nerves that cause sudden bursts of heart rate and increases of blood
pressure we may be able to control them.
This might require a genetic approach.
Currently this is not possible, but it is coming. Methods are on the horizon for making
specific genetic alterations to specific nerves so we could literally turn them
on and off. Google “DREADDs” if you are
interested, that is the name of one of the technologies! (It kind of needs renaming though doesn’t it,
because many people are already in “dread” of technology! ) So it's a tough
ask, but this is the direction we are going. Hurdles: (i) finding the nerves
involved, (ii) devising a genetic manipulation that allows limiting their
function, without stopping them from working entirely i.e., if you are actually
having a fight or making flight from a real threat! Finally, (iii) …eerm… the
small matter of deploying these genetic manipulations in real people and other
vulnerable animals. I think we can do it; but I have no idea of the timeframe.
I expect it will be within my lifetime; unless of course, my own life is prematurely ended by some rascal that
chooses to annoy me :-)
References:
Knight et al. 2016 J Am Heart Assoc, 2016; 5 (12): e005098
Mittleman MA, et al. 1995 Circulation; 92:1720-1725
Leor J. et al. 1996. N Engl J Med 1996; 334:413-419.
Wilbert-Lampen U et al. 2008; N Engl J Med358:475-483.
Willich, S. N., et al. 1992. Am J Cardiology, 70(1), 65–68
Disclaimer:
We are funded by the BBSRC
References:
Knight et al. 2016 J Am Heart Assoc, 2016; 5 (12): e005098
Mittleman MA, et al. 1995 Circulation; 92:1720-1725
Leor J. et al. 1996. N Engl J Med 1996; 334:413-419.
Wilbert-Lampen U et al. 2008; N Engl J Med358:475-483.
Willich, S. N., et al. 1992. Am J Cardiology, 70(1), 65–68
Disclaimer:
We are funded by the BBSRC
Related to science I was thought you might find the following topic interesting: Neuroscientists have discovered that the subconscious side of the brain can make a decision up to 10 seconds before your conscious side. This has multiple philosophical and social implications. If you'd like to read more in depth; I have written an article about this topic: http://soarsmedicine.blogspot.co.uk/2017/09/the-brain-and-its-unconscious-decision.html?spref=bl
ReplyDelete